THEIR QUESTIONS, ANSWERED WITH SOURCES
Every question is quoted from Project Jupiter Together's own FAQ page, with their answer in one line. Tap a question for the answer the documents support. Water and air first, then jobs, then money.
PROJECT JUPITER FAQForce Upgrade
- Question 1 · from their FAQ
“What is the truth about Project Jupiter's water use?”
They say: About 2.5 million gallons per building one-time, 960,000 for fuel cells, then about 2,400 gallons a day on average over 15 years.
What the documents support ▾Link to this questionTheir full answer ↗That figure counts only the cooling fills and top-offs. The signed cap for drinking water is 20,000 gallons a day average and 60,000 peak. Non-potable water from the sod-farm right is permanent operating use and its volume has not been disclosed. Construction pumped more than 103 million gallons between April and August 2026. The upgrade adds a 5-million-gallon-a-day desalination plant that NMSU already designed, turning the campus from a user into a producer.
Sources- [5] Project Jupiter Together — FAQs. Project Jupiter Together (paid for by Oracle and STACK Infrastructure), accessed Sept. 2, 2026. link ↗
- [1] Project Jupiter Community Benefits Agreement (executed). Doña Ana County / Red Chiles A–D LLC / Yucca Growth Infrastructure LLC, Nov. 12, 2025. link ↗
- [34] Project Jupiter will use more water than previously disclosed. Haussamen (Heath Haussamen), April 9, 2026. link ↗
- [33] New Mexico Supreme Court Asked to Stop Illegal Water Use for Project Jupiter Construction. Center for Biological Diversity, Aug. 20, 2026. link ↗
- [9] Water Desalination Feasibility Study for Santa Teresa (Dr. Pei Xu, NMSU Civil Engineering). NMSU / New Mexico Water Resources Research Institute, report M36 (also presented to the Legislature's Science, Technology & Telecommunications Committee), Oct. 31, 2023. link ↗
- Question 2 · from their FAQ
“Is the water being drawn from an aquifer? Will Project Jupiter affect the quality of clean water supply?”
They say: Water comes from existing rights-holders, so it is not incremental use, and treated well water will not degrade the Mesilla Basin aquifer.
What the documents support ▾Link to this questionTheir full answer ↗It is aquifer water. The sod-farm right is fresh Mesilla Basin groundwater, in a basin where USGS finds storage falling in most five-year periods since 1985. Moving a farm's right to a data center does not put water back. The upgrade pumps the deep salty water nobody uses and returns clean water to CRRUA's pipes.
Sources- [30] What you need to know as Doña Ana commissioners set to vote on $165 billion Project Jupiter. El Paso Matters, Sept. 16, 2025. link ↗
- [36] Project Jupiter will need nearly 1 million gallons of water a day — where will it come from?. Santa Fe New Mexican, 2026. link ↗
- [55] Monitoring Network of the Groundwater Flow System and Stream-Aquifer Relations in the Mesilla Basin. U.S. Geological Survey, New Mexico Water Science Center, accessed Sept. 2026. link ↗
- [9] Water Desalination Feasibility Study for Santa Teresa (Dr. Pei Xu, NMSU Civil Engineering). NMSU / New Mexico Water Resources Research Institute, report M36 (also presented to the Legislature's Science, Technology & Telecommunications Committee), Oct. 31, 2023. link ↗
- Question 3 · from their FAQ
“Why did you switch the power supply to Bloom fuel cells?”
They say: Community feedback; fuel cells cut emissions and water use compared with the original gas-turbine design.
What the documents support ▾Link to this questionTheir full answer ↗Good change, and it is why the upgrade is possible. Fuel cells do not burn with a flame, so their exhaust is about 95% carbon dioxide once dried, which makes capture cheap. The switch cut smog-forming pollutants but left the CO₂: NMED's draft permit allows 8,820,970 tons a year (the developers applied for 10.1 million). Keep the fuel cells; add metered capture.
Sources- [37] Project Jupiter developers overhaul data center's power plan. Santa Fe New Mexican, April 2026. link ↗
- [3] Draft Statement of Basis, NSR Permit 10883 — YGI Microgrid. New Mexico Environment Department, Air Quality Bureau, July 29, 2026. link ↗
- [15] Bloom Energy and Chart Industries Announce Groundbreaking Carbon Capture Partnership. Bloom Energy, 2024. link ↗
- Question 4 · from their FAQ
“Will Project Jupiter have an impact on local air quality or the environmental health of the region?”
They say: Fuel cells cut NOx 92%, particulates 83%, CO 67% and CO₂ 21% versus the prior design.
What the documents support ▾Link to this questionTheir full answer ↗Yes. Those percentages are against their own earlier turbine plan, not against clean air. The draft permit puts NOx at 37 tons a year, estimated from four tests of one 65 kW unit and scaled to 2,275 stacks with no continuous monitor required, and it releases all the CO₂, beside Sunland Park, an EPA ozone nonattainment area since 2018, in a county the American Lung Association grades F for ozone. The upgrade adds metered capture and continuous public monitors on every cluster.
Sources- [5] Project Jupiter Together — FAQs. Project Jupiter Together (paid for by Oracle and STACK Infrastructure), accessed Sept. 2, 2026. link ↗
- [3] Draft Statement of Basis, NSR Permit 10883 — YGI Microgrid. New Mexico Environment Department, Air Quality Bureau, July 29, 2026. link ↗
- [77] Draft Air Quality Permit 10883, Part A (Specific Conditions), YGI Microgrid. New Mexico Environment Department, Air Quality Bureau, July 2026. link ↗
- [49] Air Plan Approval; New Mexico; Periodic Emission Inventory SIP for the Sunland Park Nonattainment Area for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS. Federal Register (U.S. EPA), July 3, 2024. link ↗
- [50] New 'State of the Air' Report Finds Las Cruces Metro Area Among Worst for Ozone. American Lung Association, April 2025. link ↗
- [47] National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone (2015): 70 parts per billion, 8-hour. U.S. EPA / Harvard EELP tracker, 2015, retained 2020 and 2024. link ↗
- Question 5 · from their FAQ
“If the microgrid produces emissions, how much is expected and how will they be monitored and reported?”
They say: The NMED air permit will require monitoring and annual reporting.
What the documents support ▾Link to this questionTheir full answer ↗NMED's draft permit: 8,820,970 tons of greenhouse gas a year, NOx 37, CO 161, VOC 124 tons, 2,275 stacks, 8,760 hours. The permit requires fuel and power metering and periodic reports, not continuous stack monitors; the emission figures come from four tests of one 65 kW unit. The upgrade asks for continuous emissions monitors with the data published live, the same way large power plants report.
Sources- [3] Draft Statement of Basis, NSR Permit 10883 — YGI Microgrid. New Mexico Environment Department, Air Quality Bureau, July 29, 2026. link ↗
- [77] Draft Air Quality Permit 10883, Part A (Specific Conditions), YGI Microgrid. New Mexico Environment Department, Air Quality Bureau, July 2026. link ↗
- [4] Amended Notice of Public Hearing, AQB 26-57(P), NSR 10883. New Mexico Environment Department, Aug. 12, 2026. link ↗
- Question 6 · from their FAQ
“Will Oracle and Project Jupiter comply with the Energy Transition Act?”
They say: Oracle committed to 100% carbon-free energy matching by 2031, ahead of the ETA's 2045 goal.
What the documents support ▾Link to this questionTheir full answer ↗'Matching' means buying clean-energy credits somewhere else; it changes nothing at the stacks in Santa Teresa. The CBA says HB93 requires this microgrid to use net-zero carbon resources by 2045, and the statute counts a gas plant that offsets a tenth of its CO₂ in methane cuts as net-zero. The upgrade's route is physical: capture-ready stacks from day one and capture metered against a 90–95% target once the storage line is connected (about year 5), renewable-gas and hydrogen blending that Bloom hardware accepts, verified removals for the remainder, and a falling share of energy from gas on a public meter.
Sources- [2] Project Jupiter — Building Responsibly (presentation to the Board of County Commissioners). Oracle / STACK Infrastructure, presented to Doña Ana County, July 28, 2026. link ↗
- [1] Project Jupiter Community Benefits Agreement (executed). Doña Ana County / Red Chiles A–D LLC / Yucca Growth Infrastructure LLC, Nov. 12, 2025. link ↗
- [78] NMSA 1978 § 62-17-12, Microgrid net-zero carbon resource requirement (HB93). New Mexico Statutes (Justia), 2025. link ↗
- [51] Bloom Energy Server data sheet and technology page: natural gas, biogas, hydrogen, or blends. Bloom Energy, accessed Sept. 2026. link ↗
- Question 7 · from their FAQ
“Will fuel cells eliminate all emissions?”
They say: No. They run on natural gas and emit, though far less criteria pollution than turbines.
What the documents support ▾Link to this questionTheir full answer ↗Agreed. That is the honest sentence on their site. The upgrade is what you do about the emissions they admit to: capture the CO₂, monitor the rest publicly, and blend cleaner fuel over time.
- Question 8 · from their FAQ
“What happens to fuel cells at the end of their life?”
They say: About 99.5% of the materials are recyclable or reusable.
What the documents support ▾Link to this questionTheir full answer ↗No dispute. The upgrade adds an on-site hardware refurbishment lab and training institute so that recycling and repair work stays in Doña Ana County.
- Question 9 · from their FAQ
“What happens to the materials used to prepare natural gas for the fuel cell system?”
They say: Sulfur-removal media are replaced periodically and disposed of under environmental rules.
What the documents support ▾Link to this questionTheir full answer ↗NMED's draft permit describes about 95 desulfurization skids with media replaced roughly every two years and gas venting during changeouts. Fine as far as it goes; the upgrade asks that venting be captured, not released.
- Question 10 · from their FAQ
“Will the microgrid operate independently or rely on El Paso Electric?”
They say: Behind the meter and independent; grid connection only for offices and emergency backup.
What the documents support ▾Link to this questionTheir full answer ↗Independence is why ratepayers are protected, and it is also why the state's clean-energy rules for utilities do not reach it. The upgrade keeps the microgrid off the public grid and asks the county to negotiate the clean-air conditions into the lease, the one instrument that does reach it, at the next consent the companies need.
Sources - Question 11 · from their FAQ
“What types of long-term jobs will Project Jupiter provide to the region and what are the salary ranges expected?”
They say: 7,000 construction jobs; 1,500 operations roles; full-time salaries averaging $75–$100K plus benefits.
What the documents support ▾Link to this questionTheir full answer ↗The signed Community Benefits Agreement requires 750 full-time and 50 part-time jobs within three years of opening, and 2,500 construction jobs. The 1,500 and 7,000 are website projections. The upgrade adds roughly 1,000 greenhouse, packing and logistics jobs per 150 acres, about 250 in water and capture operations, and 250 in refurbishment and training, all on the same site.
Sources- [1] Project Jupiter Community Benefits Agreement (executed). Doña Ana County / Red Chiles A–D LLC / Yucca Growth Infrastructure LLC, Nov. 12, 2025. link ↗
- [30] What you need to know as Doña Ana commissioners set to vote on $165 billion Project Jupiter. El Paso Matters, Sept. 16, 2025. link ↗
- [5] Project Jupiter Together — FAQs. Project Jupiter Together (paid for by Oracle and STACK Infrastructure), accessed Sept. 2, 2026. link ↗
- Question 12 · from their FAQ
“Will local residents be prioritized for jobs at Project Jupiter? Will Project Jupiter establish local training partnerships?”
They say: Yes, with a Doña Ana County First hiring strategy and DACC partnerships.
What the documents support ▾Link to this questionTheir full answer ↗The CBA commits to the strategy but not to a number of local hires. The upgrade funds a $50 million NMSU and DACC institute with guaranteed placement, against the $4 million the CBA allots to workforce education.
- Question 13 · from their FAQ
“How many construction workers are onsite currently, and are these union members and New Mexico residents?”
They say: Over 2,700 at the July peak, including nearly 700 New Mexico residents and hundreds of union members.
What the documents support ▾Link to this questionTheir full answer ↗Their July 28 presentation to the county: 2,755 workers to date, 14% union participation, nearly 700 New Mexico residents. The county has also reported that the developers missed required quarterly job reports.
- Question 14 · from their FAQ
“How much tax revenue is Project Jupiter contributing to the county and the state?”
They say: About $200M county and $400M state during construction; $10M+ county and $30M+ state a year in operations; $12M a year in direct payments.
What the documents support ▾Link to this questionTheir full answer ↗Those are their projections, footnoted as dependent on the air permit and pipeline being approved. Paid so far: about $10 million in gross receipts tax to the county as of May 2026. The bonds abate property tax for 30 years in exchange for $12 million a year, on a project the developers value at up to $165 billion.
Sources- [5] Project Jupiter Together — FAQs. Project Jupiter Together (paid for by Oracle and STACK Infrastructure), accessed Sept. 2, 2026. link ↗
- [2] Project Jupiter — Building Responsibly (presentation to the Board of County Commissioners). Oracle / STACK Infrastructure, presented to Doña Ana County, July 28, 2026. link ↗
- [1] Project Jupiter Community Benefits Agreement (executed). Doña Ana County / Red Chiles A–D LLC / Yucca Growth Infrastructure LLC, Nov. 12, 2025. link ↗
- Question 15 · from their FAQ
“How much of the investment from Project Jupiter will remain in New Mexico?”
They say: More than $4.7 billion in long-term economic impact to the state and county.
What the documents support ▾Link to this questionTheir full answer ↗Their own IMPLAN estimate, and we use it as the baseline. The upgrade adds about $1.7 billion on top over 17 years from produce, water sales, land leases and higher payments in lieu of taxes, for about 8% of the $50 billion first phase (2.5% of the bond cap, a ceiling, not cash) in added capital before the federal capture credit. Our figures are estimates built on their total, and labeled as such.